home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT2151>
- <title>
- Aug. 13, 1990: Hot Tempers In Hawaii
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Aug. 13, 1990 Iraq On The March
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ENVIRONMENT, Page 68
- Hot Tempers in Hawaii
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Exploiting clean geothermal energy could threaten a rain forest
- </p>
- <p> It sounds like an environmentalist's dream. On the Big
- Island of Hawaii, the state government and several energy
- companies hope to replace by 2007 much of Hawaii's imported
- foreign oil with a supply of clean, natural and endlessly
- renewable power. They plan to do this by tapping the geothermal
- power contained in the molten rock that lies underground in the
- volcano-studded land.
- </p>
- <p> However, environmentalists are anything but happy. Local
- conservation groups, along with such national organizations as
- the Rainforest Action Network, the Sierra Club and the Natural
- Resources Defense Council, call the geothermal project unsafe
- and unnecessary. Moreover, they argue, the drilling rigs, power
- plants, transmission lines and roads in the plan will harm or
- destroy tracts of the precious Wao Kele O Puna rain forest.
- Even native Hawaiian religious groups oppose the scheme,
- claiming that it will rob the volcano-dwelling goddess Pele of
- body heat.
- </p>
- <p> The fight over geothermal energy has become one of the most
- divisive issues in Hawaii's history, pitting scientist against
- scientist and triggering demonstrations bigger than anything
- the state has seen since the Vietnam War. Last week trials
- began for 119 protesters hauled off in handcuffs in March for
- trying to block the gates at the test drilling site in the Wao
- Kele O Puna forest. Smaller-scale protests have been taking
- place sporadically since then.
- </p>
- <p> The pro-geothermal camp has powerful arguments on its side.
- Hawaii currently depends on foreign oil to generate 87% of its
- electricity. Burning petroleum causes air pollution, and
- bringing it in by tanker makes oil spills an ever present
- danger. As an alternative energy source, geothermal generation
- is a proven technology. It supplies about 5% of California's
- electricity and provides power in two other states and about
- 20 foreign countries as well. Advocates admit that tapping the
- earth's heat in this fashion will also bring up noxious
- hydrogen sulfide and sulfur-dioxide gases, but they argue that
- the Kilauea volcano, just a few miles away, spews out far more
- of the very same gases.
- </p>
- <p> The plan's proponents point out that only 3.2 of the
- forest's 10,930 hectares (eight of 27,000 acres) have been
- bulldozed so far, in preparation for installing a 25-MW,
- 12-well plant (only one well has been drilled). Even the most
- grandiose plan, which would generate 500 MW of electricity,
- would require only 142 hectares (350 acres). And while that
- would necessarily destroy some native plants and animals, at
- least one team of scientists from the University of Hawaii has
- concluded that Wao Kele O Puna has long since ceased to be
- pristine. Invaded by pigs, cats, mongooses and exotic plants
- brought to Hawaii in waves of immigration over hundreds of
- years, the forest is considered inferior to adjacent areas as
- an undisturbed natural biological laboratory.
- </p>
- <p> Besides, advocates say, although Hawaii is the fourth
- smallest state, it ranks seventh in state-owned forest land,
- with 364,370 hectares (900,000 acres). Another 109,320 hectares
- (270,000 acres) are wildlife refuges, and 11,740 hectares
- (29,000 acres) are solely or jointly managed by the Nature
- Conservancy. "To suggest that the state of Hawaii is a villain
- for recklessly demolishing its rain forests is insulting and
- unfair," said Senator Daniel Inouye in June, while asking
- Congress to appropriate $15 million for Hawaiian geothermal
- research.
- </p>
- <p> Those opposed to the development contend that the state is
- being, if not villainous, at least reckless. For one thing,
- they argue, putting power plants close to an active volcano is
- fool hardy. Another objection is that using the total area of
- cleared forest land to measure environmental damage is
- misleading. The roads that connect cleared areas are also
- destructive, since they provide avenues along which species
- from one area can invade another (plant seeds, for example, can
- stick to vehicle tires). Wao Kele O Puna may not be the most
- pristine forest in Hawaii, but just 10% of the state's original
- lowland rain forest remains intact. The forest is still home
- to animals, such as the Hawaiian hawk and the happy-face
- spider, which are found only in the islands, as well as to
- unique medicinal plants. Says Henry Auwae, a practitioner of
- herbal medicine who traveled to Washington last year to share
- his knowledge with the Smithsonian Institution: "Wao Kele
- produces these plants with a quality and potency I have found
- nowhere else."
- </p>
- <p> Environmentalists also worry about how the electricity would
- get from the plant to Honolulu consumers, some 320 km (200
- miles) away on the island of Oahu. Part of the plan calls for
- an undersea cable 222 km (138 miles) long, traversing the
- 1,920-meter-deep (6,300 ft.) Alenuihaha Channel. That would be
- the longest and deepest undersea electrical transmission line
- in the world. No one knows whether such a cable could operate
- reliably, nor whether its construction might harm the Cape
- Kinau nature reserve on Maui.
- </p>
- <p> Finally, while they share the pro-geothermal group's
- abhorrence of burning oil to produce electricity, those opposed
- to the project believe that other technologies, including wind
- and solar power, should be given higher priority than
- geothermal. And by far the best way to reduce oil use, they
- say, is through conservation.
- </p>
- <p> State officials respond that such measures are useful, but
- not sufficient, and that geothermal energy deserves a fair
- trial. Environmentalists can take heart, though, from the fact
- that a final master plan for the project and an environmental
- impact statement are not due until early 1992--leaving plenty
- of time for more protests.
- </p>
- <p>By Michael D. Lemonick. Reported by Jim Borg/Puna.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-